I chose subject with shadow areas, since these tend to show noise more. And low depth-of-field for the same reason.
Note that I have turned off the noise reduction the camera does by default, since I've found that computer software does a better job (not surprising, given the demands of the tast). I have used Nik's Define, but others are good too.
If you leave the in-camera NR on, you'll probably get a quality which is in between what I show here before and after.
You have to click on them to see the differences.
Something which may not be clear in the resolution Blogger allows is that high-ISO downsides are not only about noise, but also less sharpness/detail. And noise-reduction, while it makes for smoother pictures, tends to make this worse.
ISO 1600, no noise-reduction:
ISO 1600, with noise-reduction:

ISO 1600, no noise-reduction:
ISO 1600, with noise-reduction:

ISO 1600, no noise-reduction:
ISO 1600, with noise-reduction:

ISO 3200, no noise-reduction:
ISO 3200, with noise-reduction:

ISO 3200, no noise-reduction:
ISO 3200, with noise-reduction:

ISO 3200, no noise-reduction:
ISO 3200, with noise-reduction:

ISO 6400, no noise-reduction:
ISO 6400, with noise-reduction:

ISO 6400, no noise-reduction:
ISO 6400, with noise-reduction:

ISO 6400, no noise-reduction:
ISO 6400, with noise-reduction:

I have put the link to the 28MB zip file of the full sized pictures in Comments.)
----
If you want comparison to other cameras, I recommend DPreview.com and imaging-resource.com for that. Also just googling around.
And 1001 has just posted links to a couple of similar tests.
3 comments:
You can download the full files here.
U did a good job. I am also a k-x owner and your review is really helpful. It seems its better to turn off the noise reduction in the camera and do it on the PC.
Thanks, Gunnasekkhaar.
Post a Comment