
Once again I owe much to the high sensitivity and the image stabilization of modern digital cameras, the light was very low indeed, almost night.
I have emulated the darkness in the image with a little manipulation. The camera of course tends to make all pictures neutral no matter the light level.
Dayu said:
amazing to think one has the technology today to capture a visual of a streamlet (a droplet streaming?) of rain falling...
eolake said...
Interestingly, though, I only saw the drops on the lamp post after the fact. It was getting dark very rapidly, so I was working very fast, and I was really photographing the tree with the red house behind it. (The dusk light was very red at the point.) It was only the last images I took that I thought to focus on the post instead of the tree, and I finally judged that to be the superior image.
Below is an earlier version. You'll see that in the top image I zoomed in closer also. And I dampened some of the brigher parts of the background in the computer.

I don't think I would have gotten to the final version at all if I'd been shooting film. Even if I could have gotten myself to use that much film that rapidly, it is still a matter of running out of film every 36 pictures, and then having to get it developed and scanned.









