Friday, September 19, 2008

Fine Art or Camera Porn?

Well, if it was camera porn, I'd have dusted off the camera, so it has to be Fine Art. You can spell that with quotes, "art", if you're feeling contrarian.
It's an early experiment, but I sorta like it meself.

posted by Eolake Stobblehouse @ Friday, September 19, 2008   5 comments links to this post

5 Comments:

At 19 Sep 2008, 02:45:00, Blogger Pascal [P-04referent] said...

That's blatant obscenity, no matter what fancy pretense you wrap it into.

 
At 19 Sep 2008, 02:54:00, Anonymous ttl said...

I agree, dirty. Besides, are you sure the camera is over 18 years of age?

 
At 19 Sep 2008, 06:53:00, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A shot of the top of an Ft is porn? C'mon, you can do lots better than that. At least give us an FTn w/F36, black thank you.
An SL MOT would be somewhat more obscure porn, but a really obscure porn would an Alpa 11EL w/motor.
I actualy saw one of those beasties at KSC a while back; it wasn't porn, it was more an abomination. (g)

-jbh-

 
At 19 Sep 2008, 12:55:00, Blogger eolake said...

This girl is forty, can you credit it!?

It's not an Ft, it's an F. The king of cameras in the sixties.

 
At 19 Sep 2008, 20:07:00, Anonymous ttl said...

I'm glad it's just the camera, without an "operator".

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


Website Counter