Friday, May 28, 2010

Ask Dad: Why Are Men So Fascinated With Breasts?

[Thanks to Joe]
Ask Dad: Why Are Men So Fascinated With Breasts?, article.
The eternal mystery.

11 comments:

TC [Girl] said...

Great article! The dude is funny! LMAO @ the accompanying picture! The comments were pretty entertaining, too. (my favorite: the gardeners; nothing's sexier than that! :-)

Thanks Joe and Eo. :0)

Joe said...

It is because they are each so interesting.
Like a snow flake no two are exactly the same.
When you watch closely they will change with the light.
In the summer hot sun they will change.
If a cool breeze blows they will change.
Cover they with a light blouse or heavy coat the shape is not to be hidden.
Joe

Anonymous said...

Great article! The dude is funny!

I found him to be powerfully unfunny.

Umbra said...

Hey Eo, where did you find a pic of a clothed woman? I didn't know they existed. What is the world coming to...

Eolake Stobblehouse said...

I had to search a bit.

Pascal [P-04referent] said...

Why? Hmmm... let's see...

Nope. Drawing a blank. I think I'll ask that Danish buddy of mine; he might have a clue. (Just a hunch.)
A hunch, a hump... whatever.
"My humps. My humps. My lovely lady lumps. Check it out!"

..."powerfully unfunny": well, yeah, but powerful nevertheless! :-D
Just like this version. Powerfully gross. ;-)

Umbra,
I'm just as flabbergastified as you are.
But then again... you can find pretty much anything on the internet!!!

Anonymous said...

This is another article that doesn't say a damn thing. He lists some of the reasons we like tits, but doesn't come remotely cose to saying why. Then in typical anti-intellectual fashion, makes disparaging comments about the possible scientific explanations. What a douche. Anyone who laughed at that must be mentally challenged (well, we already knew TC Girl was...she laughs her ass off at even the lamest of jokes and is very easily impressed).

Alternate-reality Anon with a goatee said...

This is another comment that doesn't say a damn thing. He arbitrarily disses some things, but doesn't come remotely close to saying something useful. Then in typical troll-like fashion, makes disparaging comments against the possible emotionally-fragile registered contributors he hasn't tried to rattle yet. What an enema! Anyone who persists at that must really be emotionally scarred (and amnesiac: hasn't TC Girl already shown she wasn't a complacent cry-baby?).
But it's true that the choice for victims to bully is getting scarce.

Going back through my portal now. FART!

Regards, Josie 9¾.

Anonymous said...

It is true that the article doesn't say anything, though. I actually wouldn't have minded hearing what an anthropologist had to say about it. I mean, understanding why we like something doesn't mean we'll stop liking it. Understanding how an orgasm happens (well, at least in men...the female orgasm still remains a mystery...I mean, if Houdini had a problem with it, what chance do the rest of us have?!) doesn't stop us liking having them.

Joe said...

Dave said..
"wouldn't have minded hearing what an anthropologist had to say "

I am really not interested in hearing what an anthropologist thinks.
What I had hoped to hear was some of the reasons that you liked or what you found interesting about breast.

As for Houdini, it shows that even the greatest minds of man can't understand the complex working of a female;-)
Joe

Pascal [P-04referent] said...

Actually, I thought that article gave plenty of good reasons. Maybe nothing new, but a very good list of very good reasons nevertheless.
:-)

"I mean, if Houdini had a problem with it, what chance do the rest of us have?!"
Which proves he wasn't THAT talented at "working the magic"!
;-p

"I am really not interested in hearing what an anthropologist thinks."
If an anthropologist thinks and there's nobody interested in the conference room, does it make an echo inside his skull anyway?...