It's always seemed funny to me that it's okay to show the very very briefest of bikinis where you can pretty much see everything already, but to take away that tiniest bit of cloth would suddenly make it criminal.
Bizarre!
The burkha - to them, even the most modest of 1960s bikinis (sheer prudery by today's standards) is enough to send us to hell. (That is if we weren't already going there for being infidels.)
8 comments:
Nice pic of Audrey.
There are no bad pics of Audrey.
That is a beautiful pic of . . . ah, so far we have three consenting adults.
Audrey was supernaturally beautiful.
Audrey is amazing & we have a rebel in the second picture. Beware!
That statue is kind of funny. They're allowed to show tits, but not snatch. Weird.
'twas always thus. Funny.
There's a level below that where you can show a naked girl fully from behind, but nothing from the front.
And a level below that where you can show a naked girl, but you have to hide pudenda, tits, and bum.
And the next level down of course is no nudity at all. But very small bikinis are OK.
It's always seemed funny to me that it's okay to show the very very briefest of bikinis where you can pretty much see everything already, but to take away that tiniest bit of cloth would suddenly make it criminal.
Bizarre!
The burkha - to them, even the most modest of 1960s bikinis (sheer prudery by today's standards) is enough to send us to hell. (That is if we weren't already going there for being infidels.)
Post a Comment