This lens is getting great writeups. The editor told me "one of the best lenses we have tested".
----
Photos taken with a Sony RX100. Great quality. Didn't have to do any sharpening at all. (And these are even cropped because I was too lazy to look up how to set it to macro.)
TCGirl asked:
was there some "apres" processing done on it, as well?
Not really. The second one was at 1000 ISO, and I did slight noise-processing, but I think nobody would even have noticed if I hadn't. Impressive for a pocketcamera. (The stabilization seems solid too. 1/40th hand-held in an awkward stand, yet pin-sharp. (Medium zoom setting.) (Oh, just found out it has auto-HDR too, unlike Fuji X10 (sadly and oddly).)
Got anymore pics from that Sony, yet, Sonny?
Not much yet. Here's one. No processing at all except for a slight lightening with levels. (Click for full size, as with all of these.)
2 comments:
Taken with a Sony RX100. Great quality. Didn't have to do any sharpening at all. (And these are even cropped because I was too lazy to look up how to set it to macro.)
LOL! What a MONSTER! Did you take the umbrella w/the Sony, as well? And...was there some "apres" processing done on it, as well?
Got anymore pics from that Sony, yet, Sonny?! :-D
Impressive for a pocketcamera. (The stabilization seems solid too. 1/40th hand-held in an awkward stand, yet pin-sharp. (Medium zoom setting.)
Nice to read! :-)
(Oh, just found out it has auto-HDR too, unlike Fuji X10 (sadly and oddly).)
Yes...that is "sadly and oddly"...considering the price diff! "More for your $, here?" I wonder? (But...as with everything else, there are probably trade-off's...)
Post a Comment