Isn't that amazing? Here is a free gift of great sexiness, without nudity, and they remove it!
I can only guess that some parts of the general audience are so sexophobic that even the outline of nipples through a shirt (not even a transparent one, mind you) is so strongly offensive that the movie- or TV-outlet will get in trouble for it. Hokey mama.
10 comments:
Damned puritan weirdos.
Looks some some weird Photoshopping went on with the picture. Her waist seems unnaturally slender in relation to the restof her, and there seems to be a chunk of her torso missing above her left hand.
I know it looks weird, but I have the original pics including nudes, and she really is that exceptionally slender with huge, natural breasts. To the point where it doesn't even always look good in pictures.
Here she is nude:
http://alturl.com/bt5je
So sad, so true. Oddly, you can show 75% of a breast if it's from the side & no nipple shows. It'll have to do.
I'm only guessing, but I'm thinking you just rip that tape off quickly later, like a Band-Aid, right?
craniac said...
"Looks some some weird Photoshopping went on with the picture. Her waist seems unnaturally slender in relation to the restof her, and there seems to be a chunk of her torso missing above her left hand."
and...
Eolake said...
"I know it looks weird, but I have the original pics including nudes, and she really is that exceptionally slender with huge, natural breasts. To the point where it doesn't even always look good in pictures."
Ya. It looks as though she is bordering on "underweight" as many models seem to be! :-(
"Here she is nude:
http://alturl.com/bt5je"
Yes...I remember that shot. Who can forget so sharp a hip bone that it almost looks as though one could get injured being around her...and then to discover "the front!"
emptyspaces said...
"I'm only guessing, but I'm thinking you just rip that tape off quickly later, like a Band-Aid, right?"
Dang! "Don't try that at home!" You might be talking a coupla octaves higher, doing that! :-/ (prob. special skin adhesive. Some girls have done circle bandaids but...I bet only once! lol!)
Why do we never see even the slightest hard-on in movies, ads, commercials? Is it because it doesn't happen, or do they tape that down too? Also, Do guys feel comfortable walking around in public with sudden displays of excitation? My guess is, for both sexes, it's sensitive emotionally to be so exposed. Why should we expect women to be so freely exposing their sexuality, but not dare it ourselves?
I feel your pain.
Though I think a hard-on is not quite comparable. At least it's commonly claimed that other factors can be involved, like coldness.
You can go ahead and demand more hot young guys in tight trousers in films, if it helps, I won't mind. Or even buck-naked.
Ya. It looks as though she is bordering on "underweight" as many models seem to be! :-(
I wouldn't say so. Some people are just naturally that slender and aren't unhealthy. Maybe we're so used to everyone being too much the other way.
I'm only going to say this:
the girls that you enjoy ogling are not even fully developed. Take, for instance, the muscles in her arms; there are barely any. Period.
And...she will grow into those boobs; not to worry!
the girls that you enjoy ogling are not even fully developed. Take, for instance, the muscles in her arms; there are barely any. Period.
Wrong.
And...she will grow into those boobs; not to worry!
Wow, wrong again!
I wonder if you'd prefer something like this:
http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/gallery/joanie-laurer-bikini-pic/
Probably. Yecch!
Post a Comment