Underwater camera mask.
Not such a bad idea, actually. Nice to have your hands free underwater.
Saturday, January 12, 2008
MyCam vs Vueron
A subtle satire of web forums. (Fora?)
(Appears to refer to this.) (Though funnier to read.)
Also another article from Mike Johnston, typically with way-above-average perspective on things, about lenses and sharpness.
(Appears to refer to this.) (Though funnier to read.)
Also another article from Mike Johnston, typically with way-above-average perspective on things, about lenses and sharpness.
Friday, January 11, 2008
Casio speed
[Thanks to Bert]
I mentioned this camera a few months ago. Now it is available.
Taking sixty pictures per second. Or filming at 300 fps. Kewl.
Also notable it seems like now the time has arrived when you can get both a good still camera and a decent video camera in one body. Not only this camera is of that class, many consumer cameras can. (Copious consumer cams can capture can-can with class.)
Bjørn Rørslett on the D3
Norwegian Nikon expert Bjørn Rørslett on the Nikon D3.
(You can tell how repected this guy is as a reviewer by the fact that he apparently has had the D3 "for months". How do you get that gig?)
This guy is a big Nikon fan. It seems he owns practically every lens Nikon ever made.
"The ability to shoot under adverse light situations without resorting to the use of a mood-killing flash is perhaps one of the most important characteristics of the D3 concept. As such, it is bound to influence the approaches we follow in our day-to-day handling of photography challenges."
"For me the arrival of the D3 is the final nail in the coffin for "35mm" silver-halide reflex cameras. Of that I'm certain. [...] Film is no longer a viable option in this respect, unless you step up to a large-format view camera. But such a system is not suited for my approach to photography."
Update:
"Many users [That's me], not familiar with pro-calibre DSLRS, might wish for a lighter camera and overlook the benefit of having a substantial mass behind your lens. The balance with the typical professional f/2.8 zoom lenses or a 300/2.8 telephoto is just about perfect."
I'm familiar with them, and as a street photographer, I really don't like the weight and the size. I got rid of my D2x for that reason, after I got the D200.
I never understood this talk about "balance". I have never in my life held a camera and thought "this has wrong balance" or "this has a good balance". I just don't get it. You hold the camera and you shoot, what's there to balance? You hold it in two hands, you don't balance it on a finger.
This is also the reason (apart from price of course) that I won't be getting the D3, despite the very lovable low-light performance. Instead I'm waiting for the replacement for Canon's 5D, which should have a similar sensor and a similar performance, but in a dramatically smaller form and price range. (The main reasons the big pro cameras are so expensive are high speed shooting and professional endurance, two features that don't apply to a street shootin' amateur like myself.)
(You can tell how repected this guy is as a reviewer by the fact that he apparently has had the D3 "for months". How do you get that gig?)
This guy is a big Nikon fan. It seems he owns practically every lens Nikon ever made.
"The ability to shoot under adverse light situations without resorting to the use of a mood-killing flash is perhaps one of the most important characteristics of the D3 concept. As such, it is bound to influence the approaches we follow in our day-to-day handling of photography challenges.""For me the arrival of the D3 is the final nail in the coffin for "35mm" silver-halide reflex cameras. Of that I'm certain. [...] Film is no longer a viable option in this respect, unless you step up to a large-format view camera. But such a system is not suited for my approach to photography."
Update:
"Many users [That's me], not familiar with pro-calibre DSLRS, might wish for a lighter camera and overlook the benefit of having a substantial mass behind your lens. The balance with the typical professional f/2.8 zoom lenses or a 300/2.8 telephoto is just about perfect."
I'm familiar with them, and as a street photographer, I really don't like the weight and the size. I got rid of my D2x for that reason, after I got the D200.
I never understood this talk about "balance". I have never in my life held a camera and thought "this has wrong balance" or "this has a good balance". I just don't get it. You hold the camera and you shoot, what's there to balance? You hold it in two hands, you don't balance it on a finger.
This is also the reason (apart from price of course) that I won't be getting the D3, despite the very lovable low-light performance. Instead I'm waiting for the replacement for Canon's 5D, which should have a similar sensor and a similar performance, but in a dramatically smaller form and price range. (The main reasons the big pro cameras are so expensive are high speed shooting and professional endurance, two features that don't apply to a street shootin' amateur like myself.)
Web groceries
Interesting article about web shopping for groceries in Seattle, a new service there. (Good lord, Amazon again.)
I was a little surprised to read:
"Great. They're taking an idea that failed dramatically several years ago and throwing more money at it."
... Web-shopping for groceries is rare in the US? Here in this town in England, I can go web shopping for groceries from at least four stores, and those are only those I know about. I get many groceries that way, since I don't have a car, working as I do from home.
Maybe the writer considers this service special since it has free delivery. I pay five pounds per delivery, a fee I consider eminently reasonable, considering the hassle and time it saves me.
I also learned: "Grocery stores have extremely thin margins, as little as 1 to 2 percent" Holy cow! How can a business even operate in such a way? There can't be any margin for error at all.
I was a little surprised to read:
"Great. They're taking an idea that failed dramatically several years ago and throwing more money at it."
... Web-shopping for groceries is rare in the US? Here in this town in England, I can go web shopping for groceries from at least four stores, and those are only those I know about. I get many groceries that way, since I don't have a car, working as I do from home.
Maybe the writer considers this service special since it has free delivery. I pay five pounds per delivery, a fee I consider eminently reasonable, considering the hassle and time it saves me.
I also learned: "Grocery stores have extremely thin margins, as little as 1 to 2 percent" Holy cow! How can a business even operate in such a way? There can't be any margin for error at all.
Self-publishing
Self-publishing is getting easier.
The New York Times is a little behind, though, I wrote about this phenomenon 8 years ago.
In the article I mention Dune as a book which had a hard time finding a publisher. Well, there are many stories like that. One particularly intense one is that Harry Potter was turned down by twelve publishers! Can you imagine how those twelve editors must still be kicking themselves to sleep each night?
I wouldn't have the patience to send a manuscript to more than twelve publishers. I would figure after half of that, that the Universe was sending me a message.
But I would have the patience to self-publish.
... This is the first I hear of Amazon CreateSpace. Interesting.
The New York Times is a little behind, though, I wrote about this phenomenon 8 years ago.
In the article I mention Dune as a book which had a hard time finding a publisher. Well, there are many stories like that. One particularly intense one is that Harry Potter was turned down by twelve publishers! Can you imagine how those twelve editors must still be kicking themselves to sleep each night?
I wouldn't have the patience to send a manuscript to more than twelve publishers. I would figure after half of that, that the Universe was sending me a message.
But I would have the patience to self-publish.
... This is the first I hear of Amazon CreateSpace. Interesting.
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Sunflowers
I got these yesterday, sent by "a wrinkly fan/stalker" as she terms herself.
Actually a nice lady, and I was at her birthday party last Sunday.
Actually a nice lady, and I was at her birthday party last Sunday.
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
A weird twist in copyright
Apparently now big corporations are stealing from individuals, instead of vice versa. It's a weird life.
Talking about weird, how about the Allison Stokke story? I an not sure what to think about that. On the one hand, I can understand that too much attention is too much, especially from creeps who overdo it or act as a-holes. On the other hand Allison is exceedingly attractive, and those shorts are really very small. It should not really be a big surprise that men like to put her picture on their desktop.
And about that, the former article, referring the latter issue, says: "It's all doubly muddled online, where images can be thoughtlessly taken with one mouse click, such as when thousands of boys made screensavers out of high school track star Allison Stokke's photo and never once asked, 'Legal?'"...
This is a pretty dumb comment. Personal use is legal. This issue is not germane to that discussion. I would expect better journalism from Washington Post.
Here's another remarkable comment: "'What's noteworthy in each of these cases', Lessig says, 'is that bloggers, a community typically associated with piracy, are rallying in support of copyright.'"
Bloggers are a community? With common personality traits? That's news to me. If "bloggers" are a group, it may well be the most diverse group I've ever heard of. And about the least coherent.
I'm reminded: 25 years ago, I was contacted by Danish newspaper Extrabladet, they wanted to use this photo of my mom (which had placed highly in national contests and exhibitions) to illustrate an article about the elderly. I refused, because even though back then I could certainly have used any money they would pay, Extrabladet is a low-brow, unprincipled, and mean-spirited publication, and I wanted nothing to do with them.
Talking about weird, how about the Allison Stokke story? I an not sure what to think about that. On the one hand, I can understand that too much attention is too much, especially from creeps who overdo it or act as a-holes. On the other hand Allison is exceedingly attractive, and those shorts are really very small. It should not really be a big surprise that men like to put her picture on their desktop.And about that, the former article, referring the latter issue, says: "It's all doubly muddled online, where images can be thoughtlessly taken with one mouse click, such as when thousands of boys made screensavers out of high school track star Allison Stokke's photo and never once asked, 'Legal?'"...
This is a pretty dumb comment. Personal use is legal. This issue is not germane to that discussion. I would expect better journalism from Washington Post.
Here's another remarkable comment: "'What's noteworthy in each of these cases', Lessig says, 'is that bloggers, a community typically associated with piracy, are rallying in support of copyright.'"
Bloggers are a community? With common personality traits? That's news to me. If "bloggers" are a group, it may well be the most diverse group I've ever heard of. And about the least coherent.
I'm reminded: 25 years ago, I was contacted by Danish newspaper Extrabladet, they wanted to use this photo of my mom (which had placed highly in national contests and exhibitions) to illustrate an article about the elderly. I refused, because even though back then I could certainly have used any money they would pay, Extrabladet is a low-brow, unprincipled, and mean-spirited publication, and I wanted nothing to do with them.
Yahoo Groups, lost messages
Recently it has become possible to post a message to a Yahoo Groups list, and the message not arriving, and you never noticing. There is no bounce message or warning.
It can happen if the email address you are posting from is not the same one as the one Yahoo Groups has listed as your *main* address.
It used to be you could post from any address you have listed in your profile. But now apparently not, and you don't get a warning. Pretty unfortunate, many messages may be lost without anybody noticing.
Update: I got an actual answer from Yahoo Groups support! Not bad for a free service. It turns out there are "alternate email addresses" and "alternate posting email addresses". The latter you find under "options" for each address you have listed.
It can happen if the email address you are posting from is not the same one as the one Yahoo Groups has listed as your *main* address.
It used to be you could post from any address you have listed in your profile. But now apparently not, and you don't get a warning. Pretty unfortunate, many messages may be lost without anybody noticing.
Update: I got an actual answer from Yahoo Groups support! Not bad for a free service. It turns out there are "alternate email addresses" and "alternate posting email addresses". The latter you find under "options" for each address you have listed.
Tuesday, January 08, 2008
Nikon/Canon
Here's a good article about the basic differences between Canon and Nikon DSLRs.
"One of the things that has a lot of people really bent is that the Nikon D3 can shoot at ISO 25,600. This is three full stops faster that ISO 3200, which for the record is three stops faster than ISO 400. (Just to put things in perspective).
"Some nay-sayers have commented, "Ya, so what. It's really noisy). As the teenagers say – "Duhhhh!". Of course it's noisy. It's freak'n ISO 25,600 for Pete's sake!
"As in the old joke about the talking dog, it isn't so much what it has to say but rather that it can talk at all. And at ISO 25,600 the D3 really has a lot to say."
"One of the things that has a lot of people really bent is that the Nikon D3 can shoot at ISO 25,600. This is three full stops faster that ISO 3200, which for the record is three stops faster than ISO 400. (Just to put things in perspective).
"Some nay-sayers have commented, "Ya, so what. It's really noisy). As the teenagers say – "Duhhhh!". Of course it's noisy. It's freak'n ISO 25,600 for Pete's sake!
"As in the old joke about the talking dog, it isn't so much what it has to say but rather that it can talk at all. And at ISO 25,600 the D3 really has a lot to say."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)