Saturday, May 01, 2010

Alice Greczyn (updated about five times)

Just watched Sex Drive, recommended by Philocalist. It was a good, funny movie in the traditions of American Pie and Road Trip. You know, coming-of-age stories really, but with trillion sex jokes and a guy who wants to loose his virginity, and with lots of showing of legs and a little of boobs and balls.

A bonus came in the they-don't-get-any-prettier-than-that category with Alice Greczyn in a minor role. I hope to the lord she never submits to boobie implants.


Talking about boobies (still!), I guess in the R-rated version there was maybe four seconds of boobies, all of them on extras, not the main actresses. It's typical, and I wonder if the ratings authorities measure this out exactly. If they had had ten seconds of boobies, maybe they'd have gotten an X-rating, do you think?
(And if they get that, most theatres won't show the film, so they're at the mercy of the ratings authorities, is my understanding. It's weird.) Even so, why don't they cut loose in the DVD version?* It's a big draw, I mean, men will sit in smoky bars and drink ten-dollar drinks just to look at boobs. I mean, not me, I tried it once, an afternoon show in Copenhagen, but it was just... boring and embarrassing. But I will gladly watch them movies, if the movie is not too bad.

Actually that's interesting: it does take more than that. This is the reason I don't have video on Domai: I never found any nude-girl videos which I didn't think were boring. Girls lounging about, or walking leisurely in the surf, rubbing their flanks sensuously, it's... just boring after a minute or two. And fake. It's fake because nobody ever moves like that when there's not a video camera pointing at them. It's a bit odd.


* Update: maybe they do. I thought the R-rated version was the more adult version, but it seems that "creamy", describing the other version, does not stand for softer, but for, whatever, and that one is unrated, a bit more boobs.
(I was a bit cynical after paying many years ago for an all-git-out uncensored version of American Pie, supposedly, and I couldn't tell the difference.)

They actually over-done it a little (to stay in the Southern vernacular), for the "irony" I suppose. They have inserted a long close-up shot of what we're supposed to think are Katrina Bowden's tits but which are never seen in the same room as Clark Kent, I mean, her face, and are too large anyway. And perhaps most silly, in several shots, a naked young woman just walks in front of the camera, over the dialogue and everything, pauses, and walks on! The actors never notice her. It seems to have been done later by green-screen. I hope the irony thing works out for them, because otherwise it's looking like lack of respect for the audience.
... Aha, turns out they did put in a big, silly disclaimer in the beginning of the Unrated Version, stating that it has a lot more gratuitous stuff, and sucks. And a more serious disclaimer that the real film is better than this silly for-fans-only version. Which is true, when it's done like this.

Oh, by the way, another gripe: when films *do* put in a nude girl or two, it's usually those horrible porn industry girls with their pneumatic breasts. I don't get how anybody looks at that and think "breast". An exception in this film is two amish girls who flash their tits at a rock concert, those are very cute and natural girls, and way more interesting than the inserted porn stars wandering about. (A friend of mine tells me that the girls start to look like that, all of them, after a year or two in the strip/porn business. All the falsity gets stacked on top of them, one layer at a time. What a frigging shame.)

But anyway, it at least proves that you can have nudity with an unrated DVD, which means you could make good ones too. Not as easy as one might think, though, I suspect.

13 comments:

Robb in Houston said...

I'd bang her like a screen door in a hurricane.

Very cute. Nice boobies.

TC [Girl] said...

I.LOVE.that.tatt.shirt! Have never seen one of those, before! I want several of those! COOL!

Pascal [P-04referent] said...

TC,
Where would you hang them??? :-D

About movies: I for one HAVE seen one with naked girls behaving natural and cute, very non-erotic and un-slutty. It was a Playboy Channel report on one Eobrook Somethinghouse, a guy who takes photos of "simple nudes". (Whatever THAT means.)
I'll see if I can dig you up that most elusive link. ;-)

Hey, maybe you could ask HIM to shoot you some films for your site?

Killshot said...

She is a cute one for sure. You should check out the documentary "This Film is Not Yet Rated" About how the film industry rates movies in America. Limiting the amount of boobies we get to see, and maximizing the amount of blood and gore.

Anonymous said...

Hey Eolake,
about video that isn't boring, here's one that I've seen:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xjoxn_strip-leyla-pole-dance_sexy

It's about the only movie I've seen that I think is DOMAI worthy :)

Steven

Eolake Stobblehouse said...

Not bad. But pity about the tattoos and the breast implants (though not the worst I've seen by far).

TC [Girl] said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
TC [Girl] said...

Pascal said...
"TC,
Where would you hang them??? :-D"

Would depend on the weather, my Dear! ;-)

(Oh wait! You were probably waiting for me to say something using the word "rack," weren't you?! lol! Fine, then: "I think I have a bigger rack [in my closet] than she does!" ;-) How's that?! :-)

Anonymous said...

huh, I'm obviously not great at spotting implants. I just assumed they were natural, but now, I wonder how I could have thought that :)

well, I tried. though what's wrong with the tats?
Steven

Eolake Stobblehouse said...

Well, I don't hate tattoos the way many do (I get letters), but like implants, in *most* cases I think they are a step down. Like painting on a rose.

Pascal [P-04referent] said...

Holey shirt! They're ACTUAL garments! At first I thought they were real tattoos looking like a shirt. Hence my (innocent, I swear!) question about "where to hang them".
(Whew!) This means that TC isn't going to go all samoan/yakuza on us any time soon. [Yes, you don't have to tell me, *I KNOW* I watch way too much american wrestling!]

If you're going to permanently decorate your skin, better make real sure it's something you'll be okay with wearing all your life, right?

This is why I MUCH prefer body painting over tattoos, as a general principle. You can go wild, and still take it off eventually.

"Rack"... FUNNY! But really, your mind is dirtier than mine.
(And therefore you're my type of gal!!! ;-)

Time to bring your... rack out of the closet, don't you think? ROTFL!

"Like painting on a rose."
The Spade brothers (Two, Five and Seven) would disagree with you. Painting HRM of Hearts' white roses in red *almost* saved their heads. If it weren't for that Alice girl's diversion when she turned all gigantic at the trial... (gulp!) they would've been goners fer shoore!


I think that "general rule" probably says a lot about the ACTUAL self-confidence of those girls who go into the stripping/porn business. Clearly, they display their body not out of great confidence, but to fight a lack of. A classic bluffing reflex strategy. Otherwise, they'd stick to how they are, instead of constantly trying to APPEAR appealing to the arbitrarily-standarded masses, by constantly changing their very selves.

I was just reading this article, saying that politicians also generally reveal a great narcissic insecure fear of not being accepted, which causes in them a "donjuanism" expressed through their constant THIRST for large-scale popularity. Remember Michael Jackson. That hopeless need to please his father and FINALLY be loved. :,(

Celebrities, pornstars, etc... they flaunt it to feel they HAVE it. Most of the time.
I'm sure there are exceptions. (fingers crossed, amen)

Sex is beautiful, but porn is ugly. It's a matter of intrinsic spirit. I need a woman with SUBSTANCE to feel attracted. Substance "within", in the soul. Not that repulsive inflation stuff.
I see it everywhere around me. Lebanon has the dubious honor of holding the world record for "cosmetically-altered" girls and women.
You want implants? Our national prices are very competitive! :-/

Eolake Stobblehouse said...

" They're ACTUAL garments! At first I thought they were tattoos looking like a shirt."

No dude, these are *real*!

Anonymous said...

If they had had ten seconds of boobies, maybe they'd have gotten an X-rating, do you think?

Or if they show pussy they get an NC-17.

I'd bang her like a screen door in a hurricane.

How could you? You have no dick.