Famous article about Frank Sinatra, from 1966.
It's interesting how a very young Harlan Ellison figures in the article. If anybody could match Sinatra in the ferocious-ego department, it would be Ellison.
Quote:
"It was reported then that the paparazzi had made Sinatra a collective offer of $16,000 if he would pose with Ava Gardner; Sinatra was said to have made a counter offer of $32,000 if he could break one paparazzi arm and leg."
Now that's funny! I can understand him.
Though it must be said I don't get the appeal of his music. And I have a hard time respecting a man, no matter how successful and well dressed, who is so much into fighting, on so many levels.
Saturday, October 13, 2007
Hybrid airship
This is interesting.
But I think it will be awfully victimized by weather, no? Not only does it not fly above the weather like jets do, but it is also bigger and slower.
Aeros' page on the craft.
Friday, October 12, 2007
Rabbits
Bunnies invade NYC.
And they play that nice song that Apple used to promote the multi-color iMac back in the late nineties. I like it. It's by a band named Stones, I think.
Here's a funny thing: some commentators say things like: "It was nice, would've been better without the people jumping all over the place making it LOOK like stop motion. Just because it is, doesn't mean it has to look like it." But that's the great thing: by making the people jerk around, it's made to look like it's claymation, but it's not, it's digital! It's seen in many aspects, like the huge objects, which can't be real clay. It's only a fun ad because it looks like claymation, but can't be.
Update: Eric points out this inspiration.
And they play that nice song that Apple used to promote the multi-color iMac back in the late nineties. I like it. It's by a band named Stones, I think.
Here's a funny thing: some commentators say things like: "It was nice, would've been better without the people jumping all over the place making it LOOK like stop motion. Just because it is, doesn't mean it has to look like it." But that's the great thing: by making the people jerk around, it's made to look like it's claymation, but it's not, it's digital! It's seen in many aspects, like the huge objects, which can't be real clay. It's only a fun ad because it looks like claymation, but can't be.
Update: Eric points out this inspiration.
Hikaru dorodango
Hikaru dorodango. Made by hand.
There seem to be different methods. The link above says the ball is polished by cloth near the end. This page says the shine is not accomplished by polishing.
We made something similar in school. An egg made of clay, and polished with a spoon, I think before it was dry. It could get very slick and shiny.
Pavarotti
Pavarotti is in the Google logo today.
Gee, that's a pretty prominent position for an individual to be in, isn't it?
Secondly, I thought: Oh, is he dead? And it turns out he is, since last month. So I'm thinking: isn't it funny how we celebrate people a lot more when they're dead? Isn't that a bit backwards?
Thursday, October 11, 2007
The quiet PC
Article about quiet PCs.
It took a long time for the market to start to demand quiet PCs for real. Maybe in a noisy office a noisy PC is no big deal, but working from home, it makes a huge difference to me at least.
My previous computer, the Apple G5 tower model, had a very hot chip. So it had big parts of the space devoted to cooling in innovative ways, designed to reduce noise while cooling a lot. And yet it was not so quiet. I had put it inside a closet next to my desk, and yet when it became hot after some intense use, it became more noisy than I liked, and I turned it off for a while.
The present one, the Mac Pro, same design on the outside, has an Intel chip. And it was clearly a wise choice to change to that. Around the millennium, the former PowerPC chip was supposed to be destined for much better things in the power/heat area, but since then Intel overtook them by leaps and bounds. So the new computers are a bit faster, and a lot quieter. Even while having reclaimed much of the space that was used for cooling before, to make for more expansion options.
In fact this big powerhouse is almost as quiet as a laptop. I have installed it in the closet like the last one, and the ambient small noises of the building and the neighborhood are actually more noticeable than the noise from the machine. I love it. It does wonders for my stress levels.
It took a long time for the market to start to demand quiet PCs for real. Maybe in a noisy office a noisy PC is no big deal, but working from home, it makes a huge difference to me at least.
My previous computer, the Apple G5 tower model, had a very hot chip. So it had big parts of the space devoted to cooling in innovative ways, designed to reduce noise while cooling a lot. And yet it was not so quiet. I had put it inside a closet next to my desk, and yet when it became hot after some intense use, it became more noisy than I liked, and I turned it off for a while.
The present one, the Mac Pro, same design on the outside, has an Intel chip. And it was clearly a wise choice to change to that. Around the millennium, the former PowerPC chip was supposed to be destined for much better things in the power/heat area, but since then Intel overtook them by leaps and bounds. So the new computers are a bit faster, and a lot quieter. Even while having reclaimed much of the space that was used for cooling before, to make for more expansion options.In fact this big powerhouse is almost as quiet as a laptop. I have installed it in the closet like the last one, and the ambient small noises of the building and the neighborhood are actually more noticeable than the noise from the machine. I love it. It does wonders for my stress levels.
Titles. Clubs.
A friend wrote to me that he liked the latest photo (red leaves) better than he liked the title.
How can you make titles for art anyway? It always messes it up. If it's not relevant, it's not helpful. If it is relevant, it's often too restrictive, and does not allow people to make their own interpretation, which is essential to good art.
Last year I was in a photo club for a few months. One of the reasons I stopped was that a judge in a contest didn't like the picture below... because of the title! I had called it Union Jack. And he said that a title must be a "users manual" to a picture. He said the title has to tell the viewer what the picture is about. Which is just so much nonsense. If there is a short way of telling people what a work of art is about, why make it in the first place?
Of course such a petty reason was not the main reason I stopped going to the club. I was just bored. There was no debate about this title thing, just as there was no debate about anything. People did not talk about pictures. Back when I was a teenager in Denmark, I was extremely fortunate to belong to one of the best photo clubs in that country, Næstved Photo Club. It had interesting pictures, and it had interesting debates. I learned tons.
How can you make titles for art anyway? It always messes it up. If it's not relevant, it's not helpful. If it is relevant, it's often too restrictive, and does not allow people to make their own interpretation, which is essential to good art.
Last year I was in a photo club for a few months. One of the reasons I stopped was that a judge in a contest didn't like the picture below... because of the title! I had called it Union Jack. And he said that a title must be a "users manual" to a picture. He said the title has to tell the viewer what the picture is about. Which is just so much nonsense. If there is a short way of telling people what a work of art is about, why make it in the first place?
Of course such a petty reason was not the main reason I stopped going to the club. I was just bored. There was no debate about this title thing, just as there was no debate about anything. People did not talk about pictures. Back when I was a teenager in Denmark, I was extremely fortunate to belong to one of the best photo clubs in that country, Næstved Photo Club. It had interesting pictures, and it had interesting debates. I learned tons.
Aviator has arrived
I just received my Aviator keyboard.
It's quite possible to touch-type on it, though the modifier keys are obviously smaller and different shapes, and there are bigger spaces between them, so it will take a little getting used to. But not all that much, I think, and it feels solid.
ttl said...
What's that futuristically shaped thing behind the pinup calendar?
eolake said...
The subwoofer of my Harman Soundsticks II speakers.
It's quite possible to touch-type on it, though the modifier keys are obviously smaller and different shapes, and there are bigger spaces between them, so it will take a little getting used to. But not all that much, I think, and it feels solid.
ttl said...
What's that futuristically shaped thing behind the pinup calendar?
eolake said...
The subwoofer of my Harman Soundsticks II speakers.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Audrey and her car
Here is Audrey Hepburn again, in How To Steal A Million. What a gorgeous and unusual spectacle she presents. Excellent costuming.
Not to mention that car. I just love it.
Anybody know what it is?
alex said...
Autobianchi
Apparently they were, in the mid 60's , a FIAT division. So it was an Italian car.
I found the answer on the IMDb page for the film, someone else had asked the question.
Where do you see that? I don't see it.
There's also the car below. It's claimed in the film it will run 150MPH. Its road grip is awful, but it's certainly pretty.
... Ah, found something... it's a Jaguar XK-E, apparently.
Not to mention that car. I just love it.
Anybody know what it is?
alex said...
Autobianchi
Apparently they were, in the mid 60's , a FIAT division. So it was an Italian car.
I found the answer on the IMDb page for the film, someone else had asked the question.
Where do you see that? I don't see it.
There's also the car below. It's claimed in the film it will run 150MPH. Its road grip is awful, but it's certainly pretty.
... Ah, found something... it's a Jaguar XK-E, apparently.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)