Why Can’t Middle-Aged Women Have Long Hair?, NYT article.
There's a woman in this town who is at least fiftyish, and has very long grey hair, and she's just damn attractive. Beautiful.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
An Interview with Pentax USA
An Interview with Ned Bunnell, President of Pentax USA, article.
A very good article for anybody with interesting in Pentax. I used Pentax SLR (ME-Super) in the seventies, again in the nineties, and now again. They have a certain je ne sais quoi. Part of it is compact prime lenses, which are rare as hens' teeth these days.
Here's a photo from the interview, it was taken as one of the very first photos by a mom* with her new Pentax K-r and the 55-300mm zoom:
It demonstrates that while compacts are lovely, bigger cameras are bigger for a reason. (And the Pentaxes are amongst the most compact DSLRs, amongst competitors of similar capabilities.)
*Who Mike Johnston had recommended a Pentax K-r with the two zooms. He himself recently got a K-5 like me, which is great.
A very good article for anybody with interesting in Pentax. I used Pentax SLR (ME-Super) in the seventies, again in the nineties, and now again. They have a certain je ne sais quoi. Part of it is compact prime lenses, which are rare as hens' teeth these days.
Here's a photo from the interview, it was taken as one of the very first photos by a mom* with her new Pentax K-r and the 55-300mm zoom:
It demonstrates that while compacts are lovely, bigger cameras are bigger for a reason. (And the Pentaxes are amongst the most compact DSLRs, amongst competitors of similar capabilities.)
*Who Mike Johnston had recommended a Pentax K-r with the two zooms. He himself recently got a K-5 like me, which is great.
Sony NEX is small
Well, there has been a quantum leap finally, the Sony NEX system, well at least the camera bodies, are really compact!
Lo this:
And the NEX (on the right) even has a significantly bigger sensor than the GF1... It is APSC-sized (around 18x24mm) like a DSLR sensor, versus the Micro Four Thirds system's (which the GF1 belongs to) 14x18mm. This can mean better low-light performance (the GF1 does not do well at 1600 ISO), and a bigger range in the sorts of low depth-of-field on has on hand (blurred backgrounds).
(Note: the GF1 has recently, finally been replaced, and the GF2 is actually a bit smaller.)
The lenses are much harder to make compact with a large sensor, though, so with a zoom lens on, the NEX looks rather odd, the lens is actually taller than the camera body!
But look at the difference with one of the most compact DSLRs with the same sensor size!...
The NEX-5 does not have a viewfinder obviously, but it does have a tiltable screen, which I like and which I think is an accomplishment on such a small camera body.
There are not many lenses for the NEX system yet, but I'll definitely keep an eye on it.
Snowstorm by Vancouver
Ray took these shots of a snowstorm over his neighboring mountains by Vancouver. I think they are kewl, almost spooky in an abstract way.
Short poem about schizophrenia
Roses are red
violets are blue
I'm a schizophrenic
And so am I
(Source unknown)
violets are blue
I'm a schizophrenic
And so am I
(Source unknown)
Friday, November 19, 2010
The guillotine
It seems American state executions are on the up and up. Well, something had to go up. They are using all kinds of methods, modern and old. I am wondering why they don't just use the guillotine? People have survived electrocution, hanging, and injections, but I haven't heard of anybody surviving a proper beheading. (It may have stuck occasionally, but it's not hard to build a fool-proof guillotine.) Perhaps it's a desire to inherit nothing from the French?
(By the way, none of this should be taken as endorsement of executions. I think the differentiation between group-sanctioned murder and one-person murderers is a specious one.)
... Harsh subjects today. Tomorrow, funny animal videos. And perhaps the odd jealousy murder. :-)
Robot soldiers
Robot soldiers are coming.
This seems to me to add insult to injury. Imagine sitting peacefully over dinner with your family in your village in some country which has some resource that a bigger country wants, and in runs two hundred robots and kill men, women, and children. Very "nice". Really underlines the tone of the whole thing.
Sure, it'll take years before robots can do this, and until it happens, they will always claim to critics that the robots will be used for other things. But history shows that anything that can kill people will be used to kill people, mainly in war.
One of the rare Danish SF writers, Niels E. Nielsen, wrote a spooky, but excellent book, "Vogteren" or "Vartija" in translation. Well, I was a kid when reading it, but it made an impression on me, especially the central idea which is a "war" waged mainly by automatons, which are moving in one long line (never mind the doability of this) southwards across Africa, and with lasers killing everybody and everything bigger than a field mouse. I think it's a striking image of the inhumanity at the heart of war.
This seems to me to add insult to injury. Imagine sitting peacefully over dinner with your family in your village in some country which has some resource that a bigger country wants, and in runs two hundred robots and kill men, women, and children. Very "nice". Really underlines the tone of the whole thing.
Sure, it'll take years before robots can do this, and until it happens, they will always claim to critics that the robots will be used for other things. But history shows that anything that can kill people will be used to kill people, mainly in war.
One of the rare Danish SF writers, Niels E. Nielsen, wrote a spooky, but excellent book, "Vogteren" or "Vartija" in translation. Well, I was a kid when reading it, but it made an impression on me, especially the central idea which is a "war" waged mainly by automatons, which are moving in one long line (never mind the doability of this) southwards across Africa, and with lasers killing everybody and everything bigger than a field mouse. I think it's a striking image of the inhumanity at the heart of war.
Fujifilm S1800 (updated)
The Fujifilm S1800 seems ridiculously cheap at $150, and yet I see no indications of any major weaknesses (beyond it being a small-sensor camera of course). Does anybody have any experience with it?
Though some of my keener fans/critics (you know who you are) say that I should Just Get Used To things becoming cheaper and better every year, I'm afraid so far I'm not used to it. I wonder if I'll ever be. (I wonder if I want to be, a sense of Wonder is so entertaining.) For example it was not so many years ago that industry insiders said that even if sensors were to become free, a digital camera would never become as cheap as a comparable film camera! Well, we have reached that point a few years ago and now we are well past it. This camera is a dang complex piece of gear, at a price many people don't hesitate to pay for a night in town.
The first thing I would suspect would be image quality with such a long zoom, but at a quick look it actually seems good. I might even be tempted, even though a super-zoom "tween" (in between compact and DSLR cameras) or "bridge" camera is one kind of digital camera I have never owned or been much interested in.
Here's a good review (Photography Blog is surprisingly good). From the conclusion:
Update:
I got one today. It's like they say, for the price it's a brilliant camera. And like they say, at the longest zoom range, you're lucky to get a sharp picture. Use it only when you have to, and take several shots to help your luck. (And this is 18x zoom. Now they even make 30x zoom cameras, rather silly I think. I still think less than 10x is best.)
See, the third one is the only really sharp one, even though the light was good: (Click for big pic.)
Also, at the longest zoom range, focusing is often slow, and worse, the focus is sometimes off, even though it beeped and looked all right on the screen. This is odd, never seen that before.
But that's the only fault I've found so far. Otherwise it's an astounding camera for the price.
I would still say despite all that, a pocket-sized Canon with IS and maybe a 3X zoom is the best way to go, overall. The S95, if you can afford it. Doesn't have long zoom, but great quality and less than half the size of this camera. Maybe a third of the size, a real take-everywhere camera with pro quality pictures, that Canon.
Though some of my keener fans/critics (you know who you are) say that I should Just Get Used To things becoming cheaper and better every year, I'm afraid so far I'm not used to it. I wonder if I'll ever be. (I wonder if I want to be, a sense of Wonder is so entertaining.) For example it was not so many years ago that industry insiders said that even if sensors were to become free, a digital camera would never become as cheap as a comparable film camera! Well, we have reached that point a few years ago and now we are well past it. This camera is a dang complex piece of gear, at a price many people don't hesitate to pay for a night in town.
The first thing I would suspect would be image quality with such a long zoom, but at a quick look it actually seems good. I might even be tempted, even though a super-zoom "tween" (in between compact and DSLR cameras) or "bridge" camera is one kind of digital camera I have never owned or been much interested in.
Here's a good review (Photography Blog is surprisingly good). From the conclusion:
"All of this would be fine if not particularly noteworthy on a £300 / $350 camera - but given that the S1800 only costs just £180/ $230 full-price [notice it's even cheaper now. E], we wouldn't blame you for wondering where the catch is. There are a few more caveats - only two available aperture settings, an all-plastic though not flimsy construction, somewhat misleading burst mode settings, and a rather low-resolution EVF and LCD - but all-in-all, the Fujifilm FinePix S1800 is a complete and very capable bargain."
Update:
I got one today. It's like they say, for the price it's a brilliant camera. And like they say, at the longest zoom range, you're lucky to get a sharp picture. Use it only when you have to, and take several shots to help your luck. (And this is 18x zoom. Now they even make 30x zoom cameras, rather silly I think. I still think less than 10x is best.)
See, the third one is the only really sharp one, even though the light was good: (Click for big pic.)
Also, at the longest zoom range, focusing is often slow, and worse, the focus is sometimes off, even though it beeped and looked all right on the screen. This is odd, never seen that before.
But that's the only fault I've found so far. Otherwise it's an astounding camera for the price.
I would still say despite all that, a pocket-sized Canon with IS and maybe a 3X zoom is the best way to go, overall. The S95, if you can afford it. Doesn't have long zoom, but great quality and less than half the size of this camera. Maybe a third of the size, a real take-everywhere camera with pro quality pictures, that Canon.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
The Virtual Pop idol has become reality! (updated)
Unbelievable. Used for example in William Gibson's excellent Idoru and All Tomorrow's Parties books (some of my favorite books ever), an "idoru" is a software created pop singer. And now it's real, and successful!
Some think it's creepy. I dunno, I just think it's cool. And astonishing. (Not even the voice is real... dang.)
It'll be interesting to see what idorus will appear as the tech matures. Of course the main difference between Gibson's idoru character and this real (unreal) one is that so far the real thing does not have artificial intelligence and self-awareness. So far. That's a very tough problem in computing.
Update:
Here's a video with more info on her. It's in Japanese, and though it has some instruction on how to get English subtext or audio (there's a Settings selection in the resolution menu for some reason), I didn't get that to work.
Update:
Philocalist said:
...much of it is available in HD ... try searching YouTube for 'Meltdown Live in HD (1080p 1920 x 1080)'!
Unfortunately, it gives the game away at this resolution though ... it would appear that it is NOT a hologram, but is actually a back-projected image onto a translucent screen.
The bright pinpoints of light originating behind 'her' from within the band are the projection unit, and around 1.06ish, you can briefly see the glass-like screen stretching across the stage, onto which they are creating the image.
-
"A fictional 16-year old anime character by the name of Hatsune Miku has had chart topping hits and has been featured in online videos receiving millions of views. This has subsequently been followed by live performances in which the character is displayed as a hologram in front of a live band to the throngs of cheering fans. If that wasn’t surprising enough the character’s voice is not even human. It is synthetic and completely produced by a computer."
It'll be interesting to see what idorus will appear as the tech matures. Of course the main difference between Gibson's idoru character and this real (unreal) one is that so far the real thing does not have artificial intelligence and self-awareness. So far. That's a very tough problem in computing.
Update:
Here's a video with more info on her. It's in Japanese, and though it has some instruction on how to get English subtext or audio (there's a Settings selection in the resolution menu for some reason), I didn't get that to work.
Update:
Philocalist said:
...much of it is available in HD ... try searching YouTube for 'Meltdown Live in HD (1080p 1920 x 1080)'!
Unfortunately, it gives the game away at this resolution though ... it would appear that it is NOT a hologram, but is actually a back-projected image onto a translucent screen.
The bright pinpoints of light originating behind 'her' from within the band are the projection unit, and around 1.06ish, you can briefly see the glass-like screen stretching across the stage, onto which they are creating the image.
-
Nickelback - Saturday Night's Alright
It's amusing how one song can be mutated into many different versions.
Here's Elton's original version.
Here's Elton's original version.
Detroit lives
Thanks for Dan/Margaret for pointing to this docu about Detroit, which shows there are many more sides to "Motor City" than is generally shown these days, including very positive ones.
(You can fit Manhattan, Boston, and LA within Detroit city limits. Holy moley.)
By the way, users of the Safari browser should check out Extensions for it. For example I use
Other extensions I've found useful are:
(You can fit Manhattan, Boston, and LA within Detroit city limits. Holy moley.)
By the way, users of the Safari browser should check out Extensions for it. For example I use
- YouTubeWide
- Turn Off the Lights
- A Cleaner YouTube
Other extensions I've found useful are:
- TypeToNavigate
- AutoPagerize
- Thurly
- Adblock
- Invisible Hand
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)