Notes on life, art, photography and technology, by a Danish dropout bohemian.
Saturday, January 12, 2008
MyCam vs Vueron
A subtle satire of web forums. (Fora?)
(Appears to refer to this.) (Though funnier to read.)
Also another article from Mike Johnston, typically with way-above-average perspective on things, about lenses and sharpness.
(Appears to refer to this.) (Though funnier to read.)
Also another article from Mike Johnston, typically with way-above-average perspective on things, about lenses and sharpness.
Friday, January 11, 2008
Casio speed
[Thanks to Bert]
I mentioned this camera a few months ago. Now it is available.
Taking sixty pictures per second. Or filming at 300 fps. Kewl.
Also notable it seems like now the time has arrived when you can get both a good still camera and a decent video camera in one body. Not only this camera is of that class, many consumer cameras can. (Copious consumer cams can capture can-can with class.)
Bjørn Rørslett on the D3
Norwegian Nikon expert Bjørn Rørslett on the Nikon D3.
(You can tell how repected this guy is as a reviewer by the fact that he apparently has had the D3 "for months". How do you get that gig?)
This guy is a big Nikon fan. It seems he owns practically every lens Nikon ever made.
"The ability to shoot under adverse light situations without resorting to the use of a mood-killing flash is perhaps one of the most important characteristics of the D3 concept. As such, it is bound to influence the approaches we follow in our day-to-day handling of photography challenges."
"For me the arrival of the D3 is the final nail in the coffin for "35mm" silver-halide reflex cameras. Of that I'm certain. [...] Film is no longer a viable option in this respect, unless you step up to a large-format view camera. But such a system is not suited for my approach to photography."
Update:
"Many users [That's me], not familiar with pro-calibre DSLRS, might wish for a lighter camera and overlook the benefit of having a substantial mass behind your lens. The balance with the typical professional f/2.8 zoom lenses or a 300/2.8 telephoto is just about perfect."
I'm familiar with them, and as a street photographer, I really don't like the weight and the size. I got rid of my D2x for that reason, after I got the D200.
I never understood this talk about "balance". I have never in my life held a camera and thought "this has wrong balance" or "this has a good balance". I just don't get it. You hold the camera and you shoot, what's there to balance? You hold it in two hands, you don't balance it on a finger.
This is also the reason (apart from price of course) that I won't be getting the D3, despite the very lovable low-light performance. Instead I'm waiting for the replacement for Canon's 5D, which should have a similar sensor and a similar performance, but in a dramatically smaller form and price range. (The main reasons the big pro cameras are so expensive are high speed shooting and professional endurance, two features that don't apply to a street shootin' amateur like myself.)
(You can tell how repected this guy is as a reviewer by the fact that he apparently has had the D3 "for months". How do you get that gig?)
This guy is a big Nikon fan. It seems he owns practically every lens Nikon ever made.
"The ability to shoot under adverse light situations without resorting to the use of a mood-killing flash is perhaps one of the most important characteristics of the D3 concept. As such, it is bound to influence the approaches we follow in our day-to-day handling of photography challenges."
"For me the arrival of the D3 is the final nail in the coffin for "35mm" silver-halide reflex cameras. Of that I'm certain. [...] Film is no longer a viable option in this respect, unless you step up to a large-format view camera. But such a system is not suited for my approach to photography."
Update:
"Many users [That's me], not familiar with pro-calibre DSLRS, might wish for a lighter camera and overlook the benefit of having a substantial mass behind your lens. The balance with the typical professional f/2.8 zoom lenses or a 300/2.8 telephoto is just about perfect."
I'm familiar with them, and as a street photographer, I really don't like the weight and the size. I got rid of my D2x for that reason, after I got the D200.
I never understood this talk about "balance". I have never in my life held a camera and thought "this has wrong balance" or "this has a good balance". I just don't get it. You hold the camera and you shoot, what's there to balance? You hold it in two hands, you don't balance it on a finger.
This is also the reason (apart from price of course) that I won't be getting the D3, despite the very lovable low-light performance. Instead I'm waiting for the replacement for Canon's 5D, which should have a similar sensor and a similar performance, but in a dramatically smaller form and price range. (The main reasons the big pro cameras are so expensive are high speed shooting and professional endurance, two features that don't apply to a street shootin' amateur like myself.)
Web groceries
Interesting article about web shopping for groceries in Seattle, a new service there. (Good lord, Amazon again.)
I was a little surprised to read:
"Great. They're taking an idea that failed dramatically several years ago and throwing more money at it."
... Web-shopping for groceries is rare in the US? Here in this town in England, I can go web shopping for groceries from at least four stores, and those are only those I know about. I get many groceries that way, since I don't have a car, working as I do from home.
Maybe the writer considers this service special since it has free delivery. I pay five pounds per delivery, a fee I consider eminently reasonable, considering the hassle and time it saves me.
I also learned: "Grocery stores have extremely thin margins, as little as 1 to 2 percent" Holy cow! How can a business even operate in such a way? There can't be any margin for error at all.
I was a little surprised to read:
"Great. They're taking an idea that failed dramatically several years ago and throwing more money at it."
... Web-shopping for groceries is rare in the US? Here in this town in England, I can go web shopping for groceries from at least four stores, and those are only those I know about. I get many groceries that way, since I don't have a car, working as I do from home.
Maybe the writer considers this service special since it has free delivery. I pay five pounds per delivery, a fee I consider eminently reasonable, considering the hassle and time it saves me.
I also learned: "Grocery stores have extremely thin margins, as little as 1 to 2 percent" Holy cow! How can a business even operate in such a way? There can't be any margin for error at all.
Self-publishing
Self-publishing is getting easier.
The New York Times is a little behind, though, I wrote about this phenomenon 8 years ago.
In the article I mention Dune as a book which had a hard time finding a publisher. Well, there are many stories like that. One particularly intense one is that Harry Potter was turned down by twelve publishers! Can you imagine how those twelve editors must still be kicking themselves to sleep each night?
I wouldn't have the patience to send a manuscript to more than twelve publishers. I would figure after half of that, that the Universe was sending me a message.
But I would have the patience to self-publish.
... This is the first I hear of Amazon CreateSpace. Interesting.
The New York Times is a little behind, though, I wrote about this phenomenon 8 years ago.
In the article I mention Dune as a book which had a hard time finding a publisher. Well, there are many stories like that. One particularly intense one is that Harry Potter was turned down by twelve publishers! Can you imagine how those twelve editors must still be kicking themselves to sleep each night?
I wouldn't have the patience to send a manuscript to more than twelve publishers. I would figure after half of that, that the Universe was sending me a message.
But I would have the patience to self-publish.
... This is the first I hear of Amazon CreateSpace. Interesting.
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Sunflowers
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
A weird twist in copyright
Apparently now big corporations are stealing from individuals, instead of vice versa. It's a weird life.
Talking about weird, how about the Allison Stokke story? I an not sure what to think about that. On the one hand, I can understand that too much attention is too much, especially from creeps who overdo it or act as a-holes. On the other hand Allison is exceedingly attractive, and those shorts are really very small. It should not really be a big surprise that men like to put her picture on their desktop.
And about that, the former article, referring the latter issue, says: "It's all doubly muddled online, where images can be thoughtlessly taken with one mouse click, such as when thousands of boys made screensavers out of high school track star Allison Stokke's photo and never once asked, 'Legal?'"...
This is a pretty dumb comment. Personal use is legal. This issue is not germane to that discussion. I would expect better journalism from Washington Post.
Here's another remarkable comment: "'What's noteworthy in each of these cases', Lessig says, 'is that bloggers, a community typically associated with piracy, are rallying in support of copyright.'"
Bloggers are a community? With common personality traits? That's news to me. If "bloggers" are a group, it may well be the most diverse group I've ever heard of. And about the least coherent.
I'm reminded: 25 years ago, I was contacted by Danish newspaper Extrabladet, they wanted to use this photo of my mom (which had placed highly in national contests and exhibitions) to illustrate an article about the elderly. I refused, because even though back then I could certainly have used any money they would pay, Extrabladet is a low-brow, unprincipled, and mean-spirited publication, and I wanted nothing to do with them.
Talking about weird, how about the Allison Stokke story? I an not sure what to think about that. On the one hand, I can understand that too much attention is too much, especially from creeps who overdo it or act as a-holes. On the other hand Allison is exceedingly attractive, and those shorts are really very small. It should not really be a big surprise that men like to put her picture on their desktop.
And about that, the former article, referring the latter issue, says: "It's all doubly muddled online, where images can be thoughtlessly taken with one mouse click, such as when thousands of boys made screensavers out of high school track star Allison Stokke's photo and never once asked, 'Legal?'"...
This is a pretty dumb comment. Personal use is legal. This issue is not germane to that discussion. I would expect better journalism from Washington Post.
Here's another remarkable comment: "'What's noteworthy in each of these cases', Lessig says, 'is that bloggers, a community typically associated with piracy, are rallying in support of copyright.'"
Bloggers are a community? With common personality traits? That's news to me. If "bloggers" are a group, it may well be the most diverse group I've ever heard of. And about the least coherent.
I'm reminded: 25 years ago, I was contacted by Danish newspaper Extrabladet, they wanted to use this photo of my mom (which had placed highly in national contests and exhibitions) to illustrate an article about the elderly. I refused, because even though back then I could certainly have used any money they would pay, Extrabladet is a low-brow, unprincipled, and mean-spirited publication, and I wanted nothing to do with them.
Yahoo Groups, lost messages
Recently it has become possible to post a message to a Yahoo Groups list, and the message not arriving, and you never noticing. There is no bounce message or warning.
It can happen if the email address you are posting from is not the same one as the one Yahoo Groups has listed as your *main* address.
It used to be you could post from any address you have listed in your profile. But now apparently not, and you don't get a warning. Pretty unfortunate, many messages may be lost without anybody noticing.
Update: I got an actual answer from Yahoo Groups support! Not bad for a free service. It turns out there are "alternate email addresses" and "alternate posting email addresses". The latter you find under "options" for each address you have listed.
It can happen if the email address you are posting from is not the same one as the one Yahoo Groups has listed as your *main* address.
It used to be you could post from any address you have listed in your profile. But now apparently not, and you don't get a warning. Pretty unfortunate, many messages may be lost without anybody noticing.
Update: I got an actual answer from Yahoo Groups support! Not bad for a free service. It turns out there are "alternate email addresses" and "alternate posting email addresses". The latter you find under "options" for each address you have listed.
Tuesday, January 08, 2008
Nikon/Canon
Here's a good article about the basic differences between Canon and Nikon DSLRs.
"One of the things that has a lot of people really bent is that the Nikon D3 can shoot at ISO 25,600. This is three full stops faster that ISO 3200, which for the record is three stops faster than ISO 400. (Just to put things in perspective).
"Some nay-sayers have commented, "Ya, so what. It's really noisy). As the teenagers say – "Duhhhh!". Of course it's noisy. It's freak'n ISO 25,600 for Pete's sake!
"As in the old joke about the talking dog, it isn't so much what it has to say but rather that it can talk at all. And at ISO 25,600 the D3 really has a lot to say."
"One of the things that has a lot of people really bent is that the Nikon D3 can shoot at ISO 25,600. This is three full stops faster that ISO 3200, which for the record is three stops faster than ISO 400. (Just to put things in perspective).
"Some nay-sayers have commented, "Ya, so what. It's really noisy). As the teenagers say – "Duhhhh!". Of course it's noisy. It's freak'n ISO 25,600 for Pete's sake!
"As in the old joke about the talking dog, it isn't so much what it has to say but rather that it can talk at all. And at ISO 25,600 the D3 really has a lot to say."
Marcus Tristan Heathcock music
Marcus Tristan Heathcock
I am poor in knowledge about classical music, but I like this guy's work. The first video, for example, is just a lovely piece.
I am poor in knowledge about classical music, but I like this guy's work. The first video, for example, is just a lovely piece.
Gifts and creativity
This was written to me by Jim in Seattle, who is an artist in several mediums.
30 years ago my ex-wife and I invited a masterful pianist and his wife to dinner at our house... he interpreted the music composed by Gurdjieff and Thomas de Hartmann in a way that inspired all who heard it, as well as jazz and other genres. After dinner he admired an antique 1800s classical guitar made by Salvador Ibanez that was one of my priceless treasures hanging on the wall, and expressed envy of the way I could play the guitar. I placed it in his caress...he knew a few simple chords and strummed it for awhile. I picked up my guitar and played along with him, and could tell that he was discovering a new creative branch in his musical path. When we stopped playing, I told him to take it home, at which point he said he'd bring it back in a few days. I said, "No, it's yours." He accepted without hesitation because he knew both the value of the gift and the sentiment behind it...he ended up being an excellent classical guitarist in addition to his piano skills.
Creative relationships exist on a different plane, the best part of my life experience. My dad taught music to hundreds, thousands of kids during his lifetime, a fulfilling experience for him. He also directed the Seattle Philharmonic Orchestra and Choral Society, building it into creatively satisfying organization for those who participated and attended the concerts.
-- Jim
Giving something without anticipating anything in return, not even status, is a difficult thing. It's something I'm trying to learn. This is a slow process, but each time it happens, it has a spiritually healing effect for both the giver and the receiver.
... I think it should be noted that there are also levels below being selfish. Some people are unable to do anything at all just for themselves, they would feel too guilty. This of course is just the other side of the same coin.
Eolake
30 years ago my ex-wife and I invited a masterful pianist and his wife to dinner at our house... he interpreted the music composed by Gurdjieff and Thomas de Hartmann in a way that inspired all who heard it, as well as jazz and other genres. After dinner he admired an antique 1800s classical guitar made by Salvador Ibanez that was one of my priceless treasures hanging on the wall, and expressed envy of the way I could play the guitar. I placed it in his caress...he knew a few simple chords and strummed it for awhile. I picked up my guitar and played along with him, and could tell that he was discovering a new creative branch in his musical path. When we stopped playing, I told him to take it home, at which point he said he'd bring it back in a few days. I said, "No, it's yours." He accepted without hesitation because he knew both the value of the gift and the sentiment behind it...he ended up being an excellent classical guitarist in addition to his piano skills.
Creative relationships exist on a different plane, the best part of my life experience. My dad taught music to hundreds, thousands of kids during his lifetime, a fulfilling experience for him. He also directed the Seattle Philharmonic Orchestra and Choral Society, building it into creatively satisfying organization for those who participated and attended the concerts.
-- Jim
Giving something without anticipating anything in return, not even status, is a difficult thing. It's something I'm trying to learn. This is a slow process, but each time it happens, it has a spiritually healing effect for both the giver and the receiver.
... I think it should be noted that there are also levels below being selfish. Some people are unable to do anything at all just for themselves, they would feel too guilty. This of course is just the other side of the same coin.
Eolake
Monday, January 07, 2008
New Sony camera
This is a very interesting new compact aggressively priced exchangable-lens* camera from Sony.
Compared to the otherwise excellent alternatives from Nikon or Canon, this one has built-in image stabilization which works with any lens. A great advantage in many situations.
Also the price with two complementary zooms is impressive.
* I suspect this is a more transparent term than "DSLR", the latter which takes some explanation**.
Some will object that there are cameras with exchangable lenses which are not (D)SLRs, such as the Leica M8, but those are rare and expensive.
** "Digital Single-Lens Reflex". "Reflex" because the light is coming through the lens and bouncing off a mirror inside the camera to give you the finder picture. (This then shows you exactly what the lens sees.) "Single-lens" because there also used to be such cameras with a separate lens for the finder (rather defeating the advantage of the reflex principle).
Fun in the store
[Thanks to Carter.]
Of course if all online stores were like this, we'd go batty (Roy Batty), but it's much fun to see once.
Not work safe due to loud music. People often say "turn up the sound on your computer when checking out this link", but I usually find I have to turn the sound down instead. For some reason the music I don't want to listen to on web sites always play much louder than the music I do want to listen to in my iTunes.
Of course if all online stores were like this, we'd go batty (Roy Batty), but it's much fun to see once.
Not work safe due to loud music. People often say "turn up the sound on your computer when checking out this link", but I usually find I have to turn the sound down instead. For some reason the music I don't want to listen to on web sites always play much louder than the music I do want to listen to in my iTunes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)