I see that there's a fourth one of the Pirates of the Caribbean coming out. A fourth one, really? I found them enjoyable, but...
I'm reminded that Johnny Depp was asked in his Actor's Studio interview why he had never played a leading man, and he answered that he "refused to be made a commodity". Huh. The Pirates films are based on a theme park game, it hardly gets more commercial than that.
... And Nicolas Cage is in a new action movie, one of those fast-car thingies. Sigh.
I used to wonder: how much money do these people really need? But then I looked at the Hollywood lifestyle. If you are a big star, you just can't really settle down in an apartment in a reasonably priced neighborhood. For one thing, you wouldn't be left alone by gawkers and paparazzi. For another, and this is stupid, but: would you be considered for big-ticket movies if you look so unsuccessful that you "have to" live in a small apartment?
In other words, once you're successful in Hollywood, you're locked into a lifestyle so expensive that you have to keep being successful, or you're fokked.
That it is easy to over-do a lavish lifestyle is another thing of course.
Notes on life, art, photography and technology, by a Danish dropout bohemian.
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Photographer Elina Brotherus's best shot
[Thanks to TTL]
Photographer Elina Brotherus's best shot, article. Is the photograph taken by the guy who depresses the shutter, or by the person directing the shot?
And how much can you delegate, and still claim authorship of a work?
I think there are no final answers.
Not so special
Writing is not necessarily something to be ashamed of, but do it in private and wash your hands afterwards.
-- Robert Heinlein
Special-interest publications should realize that if they are attracting enough advertising and readers to make a profit, the interest is not so special.
-- Fran Lebowitz
Friday, February 18, 2011
Bettie Page TV Interview
[Thanks to Irv.]
"People said it was my smile. That I looked very happy, that I enjoyed my work, and I did." -- Bettie Page
I agree. Bettie's body was fab, but it was her happy and beautiful smile and vibe which made her rare. Joy goes much deeper than mere sex.
And:
"They keep saying I'm some sort of 'sexual innovator'... I never thought of any of my poses as being sexual in any way, I never had anything like that in my mind." --- Bettie Page
I think the model trying to be sexy is usually detracting.
"I never thought I was doing anything wrong by posing nude, because after all, I don't believe God disapproves of nudity, he put Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, naked as jaybirds..." -- Bettie Page
Tilt adapter
I got me a Lensbaby "Tilt Transformer", which will let you put a Nikon lens on a M4/3 body and tilt it to change the apparent depth of field.
There's no precision adjustments, so it's a little fiddly (and focus and aperture are manual), but then it's less than 1/5th of the price of a Nikon tilt lens, and you can use different focal lengths on it.
Below is tilt along the plane of the subject, and then opposite that plane, which is popular at the moment to make things look like tapletop photos. It's a Nikkor 24mm F:2.8, first at F:11 and then F:2.8
With the modern lenses without an aperture ring (Nikon G lenses), you have to adjust the aperture by unlocking the lens and turning it, which is less than optimal, so I used one of my old-time lenses.
Here is a wiki article about tilt (and shift) lenses/photography. It's not that weird once you get your head around the geometry.
There's no precision adjustments, so it's a little fiddly (and focus and aperture are manual), but then it's less than 1/5th of the price of a Nikon tilt lens, and you can use different focal lengths on it.
Below is tilt along the plane of the subject, and then opposite that plane, which is popular at the moment to make things look like tapletop photos. It's a Nikkor 24mm F:2.8, first at F:11 and then F:2.8
With the modern lenses without an aperture ring (Nikon G lenses), you have to adjust the aperture by unlocking the lens and turning it, which is less than optimal, so I used one of my old-time lenses.
Here is a wiki article about tilt (and shift) lenses/photography. It's not that weird once you get your head around the geometry.
Changing minds
(Not written my me. -E.)
---
We've been thinking this way a long time, but does it really make sense NOW?:
A newly married couple was preparing dinner together, a roast, and the man watched his new bride rub the roast with olive oil, sprinkle salt and pepper on it, then cut an inch off the right side of the roast and an inch off the left side, put it into a pan and put the pan in the oven. The man thought this was a bit strange, so he asked, "Honey, why did you just cut an inch off each side of the roast?" His wife replied, "That's just how you make a roast. That's how my mother showed me to do it and I don't see any reason to change it." The man still didn't understand, but he thought, "If this is the strangest thing she does, I guess I can get used to it." He counted his blessings and let the matter drop.
A few weeks later, they were invited to her mother's house for dinner. She said, "I'm having a roast, I hope you like them." "Definitely," the man said. He thought, "Oh good, maybe now I'll find out where this business started."
When they arrived at his mother-in-law's house, the man went straight into the kitchen and asked if he could watch her prepare the meal. "Of course," she said, so he sat and watched her rub the roast with olive oil, sprinkle it with salt and pepper, cut an inch off the right side and an inch off the left side, put the roast in a pan and put it in the oven. He asked his mother-in-law, "Why did you cut an inch off each side of the roast?" She replied, "That's just how you make a roast."
The poor man was getting more and more baffled, but he enjoyed his dinner and they returned home.
A couple months passed, then they were invited to her grandmother's house for dinner. The man, determined as ever, called ahead and said, "Would you mind a special request for dinner? I'd really like to have a roast." She agreed and a few days later, they went to grandma's.
He asked if he could watch her prepare the meal and she said, "sure."
So he sat down and watched her rub olive oil on the roast, sprinkle it with salt and pepper, put it into a pan and put it in the oven.
He said, "Didn't you forget something?"
She said, "No, I don't think so. Why do you ask?"
He said, "You didn't cut an inch off each side of the roast before putting it in the pan."
She laughed and said, "Oh, that! I stopped doing that years ago."
"Why?"
"I got a bigger pan."
---
We've been thinking this way a long time, but does it really make sense NOW?:
A newly married couple was preparing dinner together, a roast, and the man watched his new bride rub the roast with olive oil, sprinkle salt and pepper on it, then cut an inch off the right side of the roast and an inch off the left side, put it into a pan and put the pan in the oven. The man thought this was a bit strange, so he asked, "Honey, why did you just cut an inch off each side of the roast?" His wife replied, "That's just how you make a roast. That's how my mother showed me to do it and I don't see any reason to change it." The man still didn't understand, but he thought, "If this is the strangest thing she does, I guess I can get used to it." He counted his blessings and let the matter drop.
A few weeks later, they were invited to her mother's house for dinner. She said, "I'm having a roast, I hope you like them." "Definitely," the man said. He thought, "Oh good, maybe now I'll find out where this business started."
When they arrived at his mother-in-law's house, the man went straight into the kitchen and asked if he could watch her prepare the meal. "Of course," she said, so he sat and watched her rub the roast with olive oil, sprinkle it with salt and pepper, cut an inch off the right side and an inch off the left side, put the roast in a pan and put it in the oven. He asked his mother-in-law, "Why did you cut an inch off each side of the roast?" She replied, "That's just how you make a roast."
The poor man was getting more and more baffled, but he enjoyed his dinner and they returned home.
A couple months passed, then they were invited to her grandmother's house for dinner. The man, determined as ever, called ahead and said, "Would you mind a special request for dinner? I'd really like to have a roast." She agreed and a few days later, they went to grandma's.
He asked if he could watch her prepare the meal and she said, "sure."
So he sat down and watched her rub olive oil on the roast, sprinkle it with salt and pepper, put it into a pan and put it in the oven.
He said, "Didn't you forget something?"
She said, "No, I don't think so. Why do you ask?"
He said, "You didn't cut an inch off each side of the roast before putting it in the pan."
She laughed and said, "Oh, that! I stopped doing that years ago."
"Why?"
"I got a bigger pan."
---
(From this week's Domai newsletter (has nudity).)
Thursday, February 17, 2011
The Borrowers
The film has a very different story from the book.
But fortunately it is good. I would even call it surprisingly good. It is really funny for one thing. John Goodman is priceless as the villain.
And I like their sort-of timeless choice for the design. Most of it is almost a period piece, beautifully designed like the fifties, the muted greens and reds and so on. Very nice. But then they will suddenly have the occasional thing, like small mobile phones. But they are mobile phones like they might have looked like if they were designed in the fifties! Great stuff.
But fortunately it is good. I would even call it surprisingly good. It is really funny for one thing. John Goodman is priceless as the villain.
And I like their sort-of timeless choice for the design. Most of it is almost a period piece, beautifully designed like the fifties, the muted greens and reds and so on. Very nice. But then they will suddenly have the occasional thing, like small mobile phones. But they are mobile phones like they might have looked like if they were designed in the fifties! Great stuff.
Benji Saves the Universe
I'm almost done with Troll 2. (By the way, it's not a sequel, and it does not have a single troll in it!)
I was reminded of an old Bloom County strip (mid-eighties, I think), which I remembered almost verbatim, and holy moley, somebody had posted it once!
"... But lord, it wasn't good!"
I was reminded of an old Bloom County strip (mid-eighties, I think), which I remembered almost verbatim, and holy moley, somebody had posted it once!
"... But lord, it wasn't good!"
Panel 1: “George Phglat’s new film “Benji saves the Universe” has brought the word ‘Bad” to new levels of badness.”
Panel 2: “Bad acting. Bad effects. Bad everything. This bad film just oozed rottenness from every bad scene… simply bad beyond beyond all infinite dimensions of possible badness.”
Panel 3: [Opus pauses for a moment of contemplation.]
Panel 4: “Well, maybe not that bad, but lord, it wasn’t good.”
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Weird bokeh
I'm impressed with the success and product range Lensbaby has achieved in a couple of years since they first arrived with their small plastic tiltable lens (the Muse).
The old is new again
[Thanks to Drew.]
We've seen similar projects, but I have never seen this attention to detail! Impressive. That is very difficult to do.
Even down to the expressions! Look at this:
Vine Flowers unite!
(Rolling On The Floor Laughing.) This is a photo of a Vine Flower apparently. No, really, it is a flower, and no photoshopping much.
And people say that Georgia O'Keeffe's flower pictures are, uhm, sensual!
... If we stand erect together nobody can take us down!
The article is apparently not online, it's from this week's issue.
And people say that Georgia O'Keeffe's flower pictures are, uhm, sensual!
Photo by Trevor Ashby, via Amateur Photographer
... If we stand erect together nobody can take us down!
The article is apparently not online, it's from this week's issue.
Troll II
Troll II is famous for being one of the worst-rated movies in history. And not for nothing. Everything about it is so bad that my toes never have time to uncurl, and every few minutes I actually physically cringe at the pain of the clichédness of it. I'm not kidding, I can't even help it. It really is hard to watch.
It's funny, I actually have difficulty using the word "movie" about this thing, it degrades the word. :-)
I think the one thing it has going for it is some real purty actors. Apart from that, it is good in that it gives one lots and lots of chances to feel superior when watching it. That's good fun. (Oh, and actually the cameraman was very competent, though you don't often notice for the horrible editing.)
The really amazing thing, though, is that it just gets worse and worse as it goes on. Truly entertaining. And there's not a grain of irony in it.
I'm looking forward to watching the documentary about it, Best Worst Movie. I haven't seen so many, but there's indeed reason to believe that as bad movies go, this may be the ne plus ultra.
It's funny, I actually have difficulty using the word "movie" about this thing, it degrades the word. :-)
I think the one thing it has going for it is some real purty actors. Apart from that, it is good in that it gives one lots and lots of chances to feel superior when watching it. That's good fun. (Oh, and actually the cameraman was very competent, though you don't often notice for the horrible editing.)
The really amazing thing, though, is that it just gets worse and worse as it goes on. Truly entertaining. And there's not a grain of irony in it.
I'm looking forward to watching the documentary about it, Best Worst Movie. I haven't seen so many, but there's indeed reason to believe that as bad movies go, this may be the ne plus ultra.
That's the only expression this guy has.
By the way, the chick in the glasses, I kept wishing to see her without the make-up. Lo and behold, near the end we do, and yes, she's a smoking hottie! Oh, and she is also the one actor in the flick who knows what kind of movie she is in, and over-acts accordingly, adding intentional humor to the tonnes and tonnes of unintentional humor.
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
The Game-Changing Cookbook
The Game-Changing Cookbook, article, thanks to TCGirl.
"... assemble 2,400 pages of results into a 47-pound, six-volume collection that costs $625 and requires four pounds of ink to print."
One might say: wow, impressive. And it is. But I feel more like saying: wow, what hard-core use of trees and ink. Put the whole thing in an iPad instead. It becomes portable, searchable, and upgradable, and you can use it without fear of getting egg white on the very expensive pages. (Just put the iPad in a clear plastic bag.)
"... assemble 2,400 pages of results into a 47-pound, six-volume collection that costs $625 and requires four pounds of ink to print."
One might say: wow, impressive. And it is. But I feel more like saying: wow, what hard-core use of trees and ink. Put the whole thing in an iPad instead. It becomes portable, searchable, and upgradable, and you can use it without fear of getting egg white on the very expensive pages. (Just put the iPad in a clear plastic bag.)
Monday, February 14, 2011
Solid state disks
I've long thought that the hard disk was perhaps the biggest bottle neck for speed in a personal computer. And it does seem that the lack of one, replaced by solid state memory in the iPad and MacBook Air is responsible for the high responsiveness of those systems, for they are much faster than their modest RAM and processors would indicate normally.
And now solid state drives are coming down in price, so... the issue is that that I can't fit all my files in a drive of less than 1TB or preferably 1.5TB or larger, and I'm not keen on splitting them up, it would complicate admin and backup procedures so... I'm still thinking about it.
And now solid state drives are coming down in price, so... the issue is that that I can't fit all my files in a drive of less than 1TB or preferably 1.5TB or larger, and I'm not keen on splitting them up, it would complicate admin and backup procedures so... I'm still thinking about it.
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)