If you don't like to see vulvas (often called "vaginas"), including one under the scalpel, don't go here.
Me, I think the mag publishers probably have their head up their ass, there's no way the Australian soft-porn law is intended to suppress certain types of genitals. They should just select the appropriate poses and let the women look like whatever they do.
(A different issue is that the show is controversial for showing vulvas. That's much less surprising than the fact that they did it.)
Update:
Somebody found it on youtube.
Well, that's a bummer. I get a message that says it's only viewable from Australia..
ReplyDeleteSo I hear. Odd, I could view it in UK.
ReplyDelete... But now I can't! They've changed it.
It's on YouTube at
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tKHg8j2aMw
1) These censorship rules are retarded
ReplyDelete2) Removing labia minora from pictures as a result of these rules is even more retarded.
3) Removing perfectly useful body parts for aesthetic purposes should simply not be permitted. Any surgeon who cuts off bits because they're "untidy" should have their own bits cut off. This includes male circumcision as well, of course!
4) Any woman who feels bad enough about her twat to have it sliced and diced is an emotional retard and should be treated as such. Therapy sounds like a much better place to go than surgery. Failing that, they might want to consider opening their eyes and having a look at real naked people.
Open your eyes people. Blaming "the media" for your own insecurities is a stupid thing to do. Grow a back-bone.
Removing perfectly useful body parts for aesthetic purposes should simply not be permitted. Any surgeon who cuts off bits because they're "untidy" should have their own bits cut off.
ReplyDeleteI'd prefer not to live in a fascist society. I don't agree with doing it, but if women want to pay to have that done, that's their problem. That you signed yourself "hentai" suggests you've got some problems of your own to work out anyway. Worry about those first, maybe.