▼

Friday, September 19, 2008

Botany porn




(Tech note: Nikon D200, Micro-Nikkor 60mm F:2.8.)


Maybe I got too inside-jokey with the title there. I think it's usable, because it's enjoyment of pretty botany. But also it was a reference to a post from yesterday called Camera Porn. Closeups of cameras.
at

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous19 Sept 2008, 20:03:00

    BOTANYPORN.COM is still available.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alex19 Sept 2008, 21:08:00

    This blog is hard work. There was only one picture there this morning. Home many other updates did I miss?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Eolake Stobblehouse19 Sept 2008, 21:20:00

    Yes, I worry about that.
    Sometimes I get a bit obsessive, sorry.

    I wonder if I should put "update 3" and such in the title?

    The Canon 5D post was updated maybe seven times.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous19 Sept 2008, 22:38:00

    I'm a bit disappointed in the title. I thought "porn" was a term used to describe sexual activity. The three colorful pictures look more like Botany VD, or something. Pretty, but not hardly what I consider porn.

    Do I need to update my vocab?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Eolake Stobblehouse20 Sept 2008, 00:56:00

    Maybe I got too inside-jokey there. I think it's usable, because it's enjoyment of pretty botany. But also it was a reference to a post from yesterday called Camera Porn. Closeups of cameras.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lin20 Sept 2008, 15:02:00

    No you were right. I often use the phrase "veggie porn" to describe beautiful vegetable photographs (aka Weston's peppers or cabbage.)

    It's a common term...consider property porn, cookery porn...all common terms used freely in journalism nowadays.

    ReplyDelete