tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post4563761165513623013..comments2024-03-26T19:19:35.144+00:00Comments on Eolake Stobblehouse thoughts: New Nikons, mirrorlessEolake Stobblehousehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-6889778611756457242018-12-09T08:49:09.120+00:002018-12-09T08:49:09.120+00:00Very helpful information.!Thank you so much for th...Very helpful information.!Thank you so much for the detailed articleClipping Pathhttps://www.clippingpathquick.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-54969557545319212432018-08-28T18:44:42.653+00:002018-08-28T18:44:42.653+00:00Yuge lens:
https://camerasize.com/compact/#724.5...Yuge lens: <br /><br />https://camerasize.com/compact/#724.580,794.786,ha,tEolake Stobblehousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-31476810053458800352018-08-28T17:35:52.822+00:002018-08-28T17:35:52.822+00:00Look at how tiny the sensor is inside this huge be...Look at how tiny the sensor is inside this huge beast! Ridic. <br /><br />https://www.fujirumors.com/now-panasonic-explains-whats-not-good-ibis-looking-forward-fujifilm-x-h1-ibis-anyway/Eolake Stobblehousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-76420118931109568032018-08-28T13:43:01.745+00:002018-08-28T13:43:01.745+00:00I agree that IBIS is essential.
I actually think ...I agree that IBIS is essential. <br />I actually think the newest Fuji X has it. <br /><br />But I think the MFT sensor is a better sensor size, for the next decade. After that I suspect you can get supree quality from any sensor size! Only DoF matters. (But even that can be faked perfectly by then I’m sure.) Eolake Stobblehousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-23328331750794975372018-08-28T12:36:33.850+00:002018-08-28T12:36:33.850+00:00Size wise, IMHO the Fuji mirrorless has it, with g...Size wise, IMHO the Fuji mirrorless has it, with good weight and ergonomics.<br />Sadly the lack the stablisation from other 4/3 makes.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15776391827458687437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-27257083891908600792018-08-28T12:13:30.815+00:002018-08-28T12:13:30.815+00:00It’s slightly bigger than the Sonys, but they seem...It’s slightly bigger than the Sonys, but they seem to have better ergonomics, from what I hear. Eolake Stobblehousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-63374668336664793372018-08-28T12:11:57.932+00:002018-08-28T12:11:57.932+00:00I expanded the post with this:
As I’d predicted ...I expanded the post with this: <br /><br />As I’d predicted here, they have indeed made a brand new mount (for the first time ever! Due to Nikon’s same-mount promise), and an adapter for legacy lenses. But I thought it could really not be any different, they could not take advantage of mirrorless design without getting a shorter lens-to-sensor distance, or faster lenses without the bigger mouth. They have great flexibility for the future with this new mount. <br /><br />I hope they will go beyond the current fetish for big and heavy “ultimate” lenses, and also make some compact ones. Leica M lenses have always been amazing, and are also very small, so surely it can be done now with computer design. <br />Eolake Stobblehousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-5109551543078291162018-08-28T12:03:58.037+00:002018-08-28T12:03:58.037+00:00Yes, it is comparable to the Sony full-frame camer...Yes, it is comparable to the Sony full-frame cameras in size. <br />And I am sure that’s about as small as a pro ff camera can get now. The sensor is much larger compared to the body than is the case with many Micro Four Thirds cameras, particularly some of the Panasonics. In fact I’m a bit disaffected with that, compactness was one of the major promises for Micro Four Thirds. <br />But as have been pointed out to me on Facebook today, when people see a small camera, they *can’t* see it as a professional camera, and so the companies *can’t* charge good money for it, so they don’t tend to go there! It’s a grave pity. And a poor follow-up to the amazing Olympus OM system, which was both professional and amazingly compact. But then I guess few real pros used the OM system... <br /><br />I’m just a little sad that I can’t get a camera the size of Olympus Pen Lite E-M7, but with the current best sensor and autofocus. <br /><br />And in fact it seems that the MFT sensors are just well behind the Sony FF sensors in terms of sensitivity, even adjusted to size. I hope this changes, for I love the size of the MFT sensor, it’s Goldilocks. Eolake Stobblehousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-84980492052313236042018-08-27T13:30:40.681+00:002018-08-27T13:30:40.681+00:00There's a size comparison with Sony here
http:...There's a size comparison with Sony here<br />http://sonyaddict.com/2018/08/23/size-comparison-sony-a7-vs-nikon-z/<br /><br />Olympus isn't really relevant as it's 1/4 the sensor area.<br /><br />The Z7 is much smaller than the D850, see https://mirrorlesscomparison.com/preview/nikon-z7-vs-d850/David Evanshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13590531184544289491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-14888805407955358382018-08-27T13:07:15.754+00:002018-08-27T13:07:15.754+00:00Looks (not seen any comparisons) BIG, as in DSLR s...Looks (not seen any comparisons) BIG, as in DSLR size, compared to the Sony / Olympus sizes? Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15776391827458687437noreply@blogger.com