tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post8944137627883767100..comments2024-03-26T19:19:35.144+00:00Comments on Eolake Stobblehouse thoughts: icamEolake Stobblehousehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-65247046863515204042010-06-09T15:48:10.935+00:002010-06-09T15:48:10.935+00:00Yes, I think so. Pocket-camera pictures are astoni...Yes, I think so. Pocket-camera pictures are astonishingly good these days, not the least the small Canons. And like you say, even though their sensors are much smaller than, say, a DSLR camera's, they are still much larger than the one in a cameraphone.Eolake Stobblehousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-55187156863160626192010-06-09T15:42:59.816+00:002010-06-09T15:42:59.816+00:00Will be interesting to see a comparison against th...Will be interesting to see a comparison against the photographic capabilities of other camera-phones too ... it's probably the prime criteria I use when I upgrade a phone, assuming that I can make and receive decent phone calls too :-)<br />I've been using an LG Viewty for the past couple of years, with a 5MP camera, that was / is still classed as being amongst the best.<br />It gives decent enough pics for snapshots, but an old Canon digital 35mm camera with the same 5MP resolution is (unsurprisingly)light-years ahead in quality terms, due no doubt in no small part to the lens in use and the much larger sensor.<br />HD video @ 30fps has been great though!<br /><br />That said, to make any comparison worthwhile / qualitative, perhaps the results produced by the camera-phone judged to be best should be compared to a known 'good quality' source too, simply to enable people to put the results into perspective a little easier?Philocalisthttp://www.emmacustomrifles.co.uknoreply@blogger.com