tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post8335744005422009177..comments2024-03-26T19:19:35.144+00:00Comments on Eolake Stobblehouse thoughts: Another big cameraEolake Stobblehousehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-19648280751585122442008-01-20T23:31:00.000+00:002008-01-20T23:31:00.000+00:00Sure, to greater or lesser degree.Sure, to greater or lesser degree.Eolake Stobblehousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-87741615966326236722008-01-20T23:20:00.000+00:002008-01-20T23:20:00.000+00:00Well understood, but still the picture must be str...Well understood, but still the picture must be stretched or otherwise distorted if the camera is moving, no?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-30215199262613485782008-01-20T21:16:00.000+00:002008-01-20T21:16:00.000+00:00I've actually seen some interesting pictures from ...I've actually seen some interesting pictures from this camera which could only have been taken hand-held, like from inside a go-cart race and the like. <BR/><BR/>The long "shutter speed" is only if you consider the whole frame. Since it is a scanner camera, the effective shutter speed at any point is pretty short.Eolake Stobblehousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-34953268613402714642008-01-20T17:22:00.000+00:002008-01-20T17:22:00.000+00:00I really wonder why their bothered packaging it li...I really wonder why their bothered packaging it like a handheld??<BR/><BR/>I mean, the full frame exposure time is still in the order of 1 second, and the contraption appears to be quite heavy. I'd be curious to see a full frame taken by hand with this, it must have some pretty interesting psychedelic effects in the resulting image!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com