tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post2421272302891898119..comments2024-03-26T19:19:35.144+00:00Comments on Eolake Stobblehouse thoughts: "Pollock"Eolake Stobblehousehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07126147415891586345noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-50771652185547407032007-02-18T16:37:00.000+00:002007-02-18T16:37:00.000+00:00And who says that babies aren't true artists, eh?M...And who says that babies aren't true artists, eh?<BR/><BR/>My baby nephew drew a very interesting "diagonal lollipop" at age 18. 18 months, that is.<BR/>Maybe I'll send Eolake a scan to post. ;-)<BR/><BR/>Have you ever wondered, whether abtract artists who "draw like my baby sister" haven't just remained children at heart? (Very young children with rudimentary motor skills?)<BR/>Of course, few children would get paid millions for their doodles.<BR/><BR/>Now, if only my cat was one of those painter types, I'd be rich.<BR/>But I do have a 100% rodent-free house. :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16327517.post-44605591034224668522007-02-18T05:42:00.000+00:002007-02-18T05:42:00.000+00:00...just thought you'd like to know: Here in Austra......just thought you'd like to know: Here in Australia (multi-million dollar customers of J.P) the expression "<I>having a Jackson Pollock</I>" means "to vomit".<BR/>I've seen "Blue Poles" up close, and it inspires all those cliched comments about one's baby sister's artistic abilities.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com